Which of the following is a tactic associated with NLW?

• A. Use exclusively lethal force
• B. Have lethal overwatch
• C. Neglect early deployment
• D. Only use NLW as a last resort

Answer: (B)

When considering tactics associated with Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW), having lethal overwatch is a strategy that may be employed in conjunction with NLW to enhance operational effectiveness. Lethal overwatch serves as a support mechanism that ensures safety and security during operations where NLW are used, allowing for a graduated response based on the evolving situation. This tactic enables the use of NLW to de-escalate threats while maintaining the option to escalate to lethal force if absolutely necessary.

This approach emphasizes the principle of proportionality in the use of force. It underscores the idea that while non-lethal options are prioritized to minimize harm, there is still an awareness of potential threats that may require a more immediate and lethal response, if the scenario escalates beyond the control of NLW. By having lethal overwatch, operators can help ensure mission success while safeguarding personnel and civilians.

In contrast, other strategies such as using exclusively lethal force, neglecting early deployment, or only using NLW as a last resort do not align with the fundamental principles of NLW, which prioritize minimizing harm and employing force in a measured manner.